A Defense of Church Consumerism

All Things are Yours

banksy-consumer-society “Church Consumerism” is a term roughly defined as “shopping for a church family similar to how consumers shop for things in the open market.”

About a week ago I posted a blog post about how there is a lot of rhetoric that keeps people in bad churches, and keeps them from feeling freedom to look for a new one.  After I posted that post, someone on FB replied simply that he “didn’t like the defense of church consumerism” in the post.   That really got me thinking – I really don’t believe that I *had* defended church consumerism in that post, at least not directly.   But now that the idea was mentioned, I just couldn’t resist.   Ergo, I shall now begin this post as an all-out “Defense of Church Consumerism.”   Why?  Because the meme that “church consumerism is an awful, nonspiritual, wrong, detrimental thing which has no place in…

View original post 2,385 more words

About jamesbradfordpate

My name is James Pate. This blog is about my journey. I read books. I watch movies and TV shows. I go to church. I try to find meaning. And, when I can’t do that, I just talk about stuff that I find interesting. I have degrees in fields of religious studies. I have an M.Phil. in the History of Biblical Interpretation from Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati, Ohio. I also have an M.A. in Hebrew Bible from Jewish Theological Seminary, an M.Div. from Harvard Divinity School, and a B.A. from DePauw University.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A Defense of Church Consumerism

  1. Esther says:

    Thanks for re-posting this. I recall sociologist Rodney Stark saying that religion as a whole tends to thrive in highly competitive “markets,” in which each church/sect/etc. must strive to provide the most value to potential “customers.” In contrast, monopoly churches, like monopoly businesses, tend to grow lazy and their members/customers become apathetic. (The example he gave was of the state churches in Europe.)


  2. jamesbradfordpate says:

    Good point.


Comments are closed.