Spiritual Children; Tithe in Judaism; Divine Retribution or Time and Chance?

I started Rabbi Joseph Telushkin’s A Code of Jewish Ethics, volume 1: You Shall Be Holy.  I won’t be doing this book justice in my write-ups about it, since it has so much in it: ancient and modern stories, personal anecdotes, nuggets of wisdom, etc.  For this post, I’ll comment on three items.

1.  On page 20, Telushkin quotes Beizah 32b, which states: “If someone is compassionate toward others, you can be sure that he is a descendant of our father Abraham, and if someone is not compassionate toward others, you can be sure that he is not a descendant of our father Abraham.”  Telushkin then goes on to say that “Sadly, one sometimes meets Jews who, according to this definition, are certainly not spiritual descendants of Abraham.”

This intrigued me because it reminded me of passages in the New Testament that treat descent from Abraham as something spiritual.  Jesus tells Jewish leaders in the Gospel of John that they are not true sons of Abraham but rather are sons of the devil, since they do the deeds of the devil rather than those of Abraham (John 8).  Paul says that Gentiles who follow Abraham’s faith by believing in Christ are Abraham’s seed, whereas not all Jews are truly a part of Israel.  I was somewhat surprised to see a concept of spiritual descent from Abraham in rabbinic Judaism, though perhaps I should not be overly shocked, since Qumran saw itself as the true Israel (or did it?).

2.  On page 34, Telushkin says that “Jewish law speaks on donating between ten and twenty percent of one’s net income to charity.”  I’ve wondered how Judaism handles the issue of tithing, when there is no longer a Temple to which Jews can give their tithes.  Do Jews now tithe by giving ten per cent of their income to charity?

3.  On page 89, Telushkin quotes Rava in Mo’ed Kattan 28a, who states (and the brackets are in Telushkin’s book): “The length of one’s life, children [i.e., whether one has them, or the number of children one has] and livelihood depend not on merit, but rather on fate [or fortune]…”  Rava tells a story to illustrate this point.  There were two great rabbis in the third century: Rav Chisda and Rabbah.  Both were righteous, for God answered their prayers for rain.  But Rav Chisda had good experiences, whereas Rabbah had bad experiences.  Rav Chisda lived until age 92, “witnessed sixty weddings of children and grandchildren” (Telushkin’s words), and had enough bread that he could give fine flour to the dogs.  Rabbah, by contrast, lived to age 40, saw a lot of premature deaths in his family, and endured poverty and hunger.  According to Rava, their experiences had nothing to do with how moral they were, for both were righteous men.

Rava’s view was not the only one in rabbinic Judaism, however, for Mishnah Shabbat 2:6 says: “For three transgressions women die during childbirth: because they are not meticulous in observing the laws of menstrual separation, in separating the dough offering, and in lighting the Shabbat candles…”  Telushkin appears to prefer Rava’s view.

About jamesbradfordpate

My name is James Pate. This blog is about my journey. I read books. I watch movies and TV shows. I go to church. I try to find meaning. And, when I can’t do that, I just talk about stuff that I find interesting. I have degrees in fields of religious studies. I have an M.Phil. in the History of Biblical Interpretation from Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati, Ohio. I also have an M.A. in Hebrew Bible from Jewish Theological Seminary, an M.Div. from Harvard Divinity School, and a B.A. from DePauw University.
This entry was posted in Bible, Questions, Rabbinics, Religion. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Spiritual Children; Tithe in Judaism; Divine Retribution or Time and Chance?

  1. truthceeker says:

    Consider Gen. 17:13

    “Whether born in your household or bought with your money, they must be circumcised…”

    Clearly those who were servants in Abraham’s household were also included in the covenant of circumcision even though they did not spring forth from Abraham’s loins. Because they were members of his community they are included in the covenant. Basically because they were part of his circle of influence they are included. It seems to me that this is a rather spiritual concept.

    The implications are pretty obvious. There are Jews alive today who may have been descendants of Abraham’s servants and not directly born of Abraham’s loins. Yet they are just as much Children of Abraham as those who are directly descended.

    Another obvious conclusion is that there have been converts to Judaism throughout the centuries who were not directly descended from Abraham, and yet by their adherence to Judaism, they have become sons and daughters of Abraham. To be a “Son/Daughter of Abraham” is to worship the One true God and live a righteous life. That seems to be what the message comes down to.


  2. jamesbradfordpate says:

    I was puzzling over that passage last week, in my reading of Genesis.


Comments are closed.