The Settlement of the Transjordan, Part 3

This will be my last post on Jacob Milgrom’s Excursus 70 in his Jewish Publication Society commentary on the Book of Numbers.  The excursus is entitled “The Settlement of Transjordan (chap. 32)”.  My last two posts have been about the settlement of Reuben and Gad in the Transjordan, but this post will concern the settlement of the half-tribe of Manasseh there.

Numbers 32:39-42 presents Manassites taking territory in the Transjordan, and such passages as Numbers 34:14-15; Deuteronomy 3:13-15; 4:43; 29:7; Joshua 1:12; 12:6; 13:29; 14:3; 17:1-16; and 18:7 hold that the Manassite settlement in the Transjordan occurred in the time of Moses.  And yet, Joshua 17:14-18 has a different picture, when one reads it together with Deuteronomy 3:13: the Josephites settled in the Cisjordan (the mainland of Canaan) and did not have enough room, and so some of them “were told by Joshua to clear the forests in the land of the refa’im, who (according to Deut. 3:13) lived in upper Transjordan” (page 496).  Consequently, Milgrom asserts that there is scholarly consensus that Manassites moved to the Transjordan during the time of the judges. (Why not Joshua?)

But the Septuagint does not mention the Rephaim in its version of Joshua 17:14-18, and so it presents the Manassites clearing forests, not fighting Rephaim.  M.H. Segal concludes that the Israelites must have already possessed the land, if all the Manassites had to do was clear forests, without fighting for the land.  But Milgrom has another suggestion: that “Gad and Reuben requested land that had already been conquered by all Israel, whereas the Manassite clans conducted their own campaigns of conquest.  Hence, they did not ask for Moses’ permission but for his ratification, which he then granted (v. 40; Deut. 3:13-15)” (page 496).  Milgrom seems to be saying that the Manassites took territory in the Transjordan, and Moses ratified that.  But I’m unclear as to how that reconciles the apparent contradiction between the Manassite conquest of the Transjordan occurring in the time of Moses, and it happening during the time of Joshua—unless Milgrom’s claim is that the Manassites took the Transjordan under Moses, and, later under Joshua, Manassites in the Cisjordan expanded into the Transjordan by clearing forests of still uninhabited territory.

Milgrom then says that the phrase “half-tribe of Manasseh” is an interpolation in places.  In Joshua 22, Manasseh is mentioned along with Gad and Reuben as Transjordanian tribes, except that vv 25, 33-34 mention only Reuben and Gad.  For Milgrom, that shows that “half-tribe of Manasseh” was interpolated sometime after Manassite clans had entered the Transjordan.

About jamesbradfordpate

My name is James Pate. This blog is about my journey. I read books. I watch movies and TV shows. I go to church. I try to find meaning. And, when I can’t do that, I just talk about stuff that I find interesting. I have degrees in fields of religious studies. I have an M.Phil. in the History of Biblical Interpretation from Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati, Ohio. I also have an M.A. in Hebrew Bible from Jewish Theological Seminary, an M.Div. from Harvard Divinity School, and a B.A. from DePauw University.
This entry was posted in Bible, Religion. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Settlement of the Transjordan, Part 3

  1. ~Chris says:

    Great post. A careful reading of Joshua 22: 25-28 is very interesting. The pattern of the alter was to be a witness of who they (Reuben, Gad) are to future generations. We are the future generations and their witness to us… worked. You may enjoy the post I did on this topic:
    The story of Japan


  2. jamesbradfordpate says:

    Thanks, Chris!


Comments are closed.