Naughty, Naughty

In Joel 3:21, God says that he will treat Israel’s blood as innocent, something he had not done before. As a result, God will regard Israel’s Gentile oppressors as if they had shed innocent blood, which is a big “no no” in God’s sight. In effect, God will punish the sinful Gentile nations through destruction, even as he preserves sinful (yet repentant) Israel.

How should Israel feel in this chapter? Here are the Gentile nations, getting their just deserts. And here are the Israelites, who also deserve destruction yet receive God’s presence and favor. And the reason for God’s activity is that the Israelites are his chosen people. God values Israel, so he shows justice with respect to her enemies and mercy with respect to her.

If I were Israel, I’d be humbled. I’d feel grateful. It would be like being the sole survivor of an automobile accident or a burning building, only I’d know that my survival was due to God’s favor rather than blind chance. Would I mourn over the destruction of my enemies? I’d probably feel the same way I did as a child when I no longer had to deal with a bully (or, in one case, my grandparents’ vicious dog): relieved at my newfound safety. I’d be at peace. I know that sounds selfish, but that’s how I’d feel.

I’m sure you’ve seen the bumper sticker that says, “Christians are not perfect, just forgiven.” According to the Gospel of Jesus Christ, all people are sinners who deserve God’s wrath. Christians are no different from anyone else, for they too have sinned in the past. Maybe their behavior is better now, but all it takes is one crime to get a criminal record in today’s justice system (though, of course, many crimes can be expunged). In the eyes of God, Christians have a criminal record and deserve punishment, just like every other person on the face of the earth.

But God chooses to treat Christians as innocent, even though they technically are not. Calvinists say this is because God chose them before the foundation of the world, and Arminians contend that salvation is based on a decision to receive God’s free gift. But both sides agree that Christians are getting something that they don’t deserve.

So why do a lot of Christians act like they’re better than non-believers? Not all, or most, but a lot of Christians seem to have that attitude. Maybe they forget where they came from. We as Christians should remember that we too are sinners who deserve God’s wrath. We’ve been plucked from the fire. We should feel relieved and grateful, not smug and superior in the confines of our Christian cliques.

That’s why I get annoyed when I hear the cliche “Hate the sin but love the sinner” in today’s debates on homosexuality. I suppose that I agree with the slogan on some level, for I believe that homosexuality is wrong yet maintain that all people should be loved (though my love for others is far from perfect). But the slogan strikes me as rather patronizing, as if we righteous Christians should condescend to love those lowly sinners. Hate the sin but love the sinner? Christians are sinners. Not to mention the fact that I’m sick of hearing the cliche all the time, as if it’s the definitive answer to the homosexuality debate.

At the same time, I also don’t like the other extreme, which says that we can’t make moral judgments because all of us are sinners. I’ve heard homosexuals say to Christians, “Who are you to judge me? You’re not perfect!” But there has to be some room for moral judgment and outrage. And I’m not speaking primarily about homosexuality here. If I’m a criminal who stole a few pieces of candy from a grocery store, and I hear about a man who raped a child, killed her, and threw her corpse into a nearby dumpster, don’t I have a right to be mad about his actions? Sure, I’m not perfect, but does that mean I can’t have any moral outrage?

So there has to be a balance between humility and moral outrage, though I’m not exactly sure where the right point of balance actually is.

I want to make a transition to the next book that I’m reading for my daily quiet time: the Book of Amos. On at least one occasion, Amos discusses the same issue, only, in his scenario, the Gentiles are the ones evaluating the Israelites’ behavior. In Amos 3:9, we read, “Proclaim to the strongholds in Ashdod, and to the strongholds in the land of Egypt, and say, ‘Assemble yourselves on Mount Samaria, and see what great tumults are within it, and what oppressions are in its midst’” (NRSV).

God is putting the Israelites on display before two sinful Gentile nations: Egypt and Philistia. I wonder what the Gentiles’ reaction is when they see the Israelites’ sin. Here are some possibilities:

“Naughty, naughty. Look at that oppression! Those Israelites are always strutting around, acting like they’re better than the rest of us. But we’d never have oppression like that in our nation.”

“Yeah, the Israelites oppress people. So what? We do that in our own countries. It’s part of our culture.”

“The Israelites have sinned, and God is punishing them. Let us take that as a warning and an exhortation to ourselves. Let’s stop oppressing people in our midst and outside of our borders. Let us pursue justice!”

Of the three responses, I’d venture to say that the third is closest to the attitude that God would like us to have. And, of course, it should be mixed with compassion for the sinners, yet a compassion that is not patronizing and does not compromise moral outrage.

Published in: on February 5, 2008 at 5:09 pm  Leave a Comment  

Calvinism, Arminianism, and Joel

The new Jewish Publication Society translation of the Tanakh renders Joel 3:21 as follows: “Thus will I treat as innocent their blood, which I have not treated as innocent; and the LORD shall dwell in Zion.” According to this understanding of the verse, God will regard Israel as innocent, even though she is actually guilty. Meanwhile, God will destroy Israel’s sinful enemies.

That doesn’t exactly sound fair. Israel is sinful, yet God treats her as innocent. Israel’s Gentile enemies are sinful, and God punishes them. Sounds like a double standard to me!

There are at least two ways to answer my qualm. First of all, one can argue that Israel did not get off scott free, for most of the prophetic writings are vivid descriptions of God’s wrath upon Israel. That is true, but God definitely gives Israel preferential treatment. Jeremiah 30:11 says, for instance: “For I am with you, says the LORD, to save you; I will make an end of all the nations among which I scattered you, but of you I will not make an end. I will chastise you in just measure, and I will by no means leave you unpunished” (NRSV). While God destroys other nations for their sins, he merely chastises Israel. Granted, he makes her endure all sorts of hell, but he does not put an ultimate end to her. She’s his chosen nation.

Second, one can say that God is fair because the nations are getting what they deserve. Just because God lets Israel off, that doesn’t mean that he’s treating the other nations unfairly. They are simply experiencing God’s fair justice, whereas Israel is not. There is Scriptural support for this position, for God affirms in Exodus 33:19, “I will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy.” At the same time, there are other passages that condemn preferential treatment and uphold the same standard of justice for all, rich and poor (Exodus 23:2-3; Deuteronomy 16:19). And God asserts that he himself is impartial (Deuteronomy 10:17). In at least one strain of the biblical tradition, fairness means treating everyone according to the same standard, which excludes preferential treatment.

Calvinists and Arminians divide on this very issue. For Calvinists, God chose the people he wanted to save before the foundation of the world, while he condemned everyone else to their just punishment in hell. If you say to them that this is not fair because God is showing preferential treatment to one group and not another, they will inevitably respond, “God can save anyone he wants. He’s not obligated to show mercy to anyone. We all deserve to go to hell. If God chooses to spare one group of people and not another, then that is his prerogative. It’s his free gift to give.” Arminians argue, by contrast, that salvation is available to everyone, but one must repent and believe in Jesus in order to receive it. In the Arminian scenario, God is impartial in that he offers to all people the opportunity to avoid hell. Those who choose not to receive God’s gift will experience damnation, and they have only themselves to blame.

The Book of Joel has both Calvinist and Arminian elements. On the Arminian side, the Israelites must repent if they want God’s wrath to cease. “Rend your hearts and not your clothing,” God exhorts Israel. “Return to the LORD, your God, for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love, and relents from punishing” (Joel 2:13). On the other hand, God does appear to prefer Israel. In Joel, does God grant the other nations an opportunity to repent and avert their destruction? Not that I can see. In fact, God encourages the Gentile nations to fight so that he can demonstrate his strength and destroy them. Israel seems to have privileges that the other nations lack.

Published in: on February 4, 2008 at 6:34 pm  Comments (2)  
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 55 other followers